More Obama

This is getting old, so I'm going to stop harping on Obama after this one. He gave a fine inaugural address, but at an event later in the day -- perhaps he'd had a few celebratory glasses of champagne, and who could blame him -- he said, "Each of you have the power . . .."

Of course that should be "each . . . has . . .."

Obama's English

I want to feel proud of Barack Obama, so I wish he wouldn't jar me with his English. 

As the inauguration approaches, every TV station is playing clips of Obama's current or recent comments. Yesterday at the Lincoln Memorial, he once again talked about "the enormity of the task ahead of us." Today I saw a clip in which he said that we need to help the automakers, but that the help should be contingent "upon them making changes."

If Obama were not a former editor of the Harvard Law Review, I wouldn't bother to mention his English.  He is, after all, an inspiring orator, and he expresses himself much more clearly than his predecessor. But Obama has had plenty of opportunity to learn these niceties, and he is surrounded by people who could clue him in. 

Unfair as this fact may be, people all around the world, some of whom speak English as a second language, will pick up on Obama's gaffes and will -- however briefly -- think a little less of him.

Obama can argue, as the Merriam-Webster 11th Collegiate Dictionary does, that "enormity" expresses "a considerable departure from the expected or normal." If that's what he means -- rather than simply a synonym for immensity -- I'll give him that one. I don't see, however, how he can wriggle out of "them making changes." He clearly means that he doesn't want to give them the money unless they agree to make changes. The way to say that is "contingent on their making changes."

Differently

I can't find the exact quote, but President Bush said yesterday about the "Mission Accomplished" banner on the aircraft carrier that it was a mistake. "We tried to say something differently," he said, "but it had a different effect."  There's nothing grammatically incorrect in that statement, but it got me thinking about what he must have meant.

"Differently" is an adverb, so in this case it modifies the verb "say." Thus he must mean that he meant to say something in a different way. By "something" I don't think he meant the word "something" so there is some unstated message that he wanted to give in a way that differed from . . . what? Did he mean that he had already been expressing this unmentioned thought, and now he chose the banner as a different way of expressing it?

Perhaps he meant "something" in the sense of "I don't really care which thing." Perhaps he felt that he had been in a rut, using a fixed means of expression for all his utterances, and he wanted to say something -- anything -- differently to break the monotony.

We get a hint from the fact that he added that it had a different effect. Different from what? He didn't say, but he added that it gave the wrong message.

I suppose he's just trying to say, "I made a mistake, but there was an innocent reason for it."  So far, he hasn't articulated the innocent reason in a way that I can understand.

Keep me appraised

Charley Rose to Andrea Mitchel at the end of their conversation last night: Keep me appraised.

I know it's nitpicking, but with all it takes to put together a show like that, you'd think someone over the 16 years Charlie has been doing this would have taken him aside and explained the difference between appraise and apprise.

Cachet of weapons

Cache (pronounced cash): hiding place.

Cachet (pronounced cash-ay): prestigious connotation.

I often hear military personnel and reporters talking about finding cachets of weapons. They mean caches, of course.

Donner or Donder

What is the name of Santa's seventh Reindeer? I always thought it was Donner, because, as I learned when I studied German, Donner and Blitzen are German for thunder and lightning. It bothers me to hear that Reindeer called Donder. Today I googled Donner and Blitzen and found out that I'm right and wrong -- if you believe Snopes (www.snopes.com/holidays/christmas/donner.asp).

The earliest version of "A Visit from Saint Nicholas" (1823) named those reindeer for the Dutch words for thunder and lightning: Dunder and Blixem. Someone later changed it to the German versions, but that dunderhead misspelled Donner as Donder, so that's how it appears in the 1844 version. The 1844 version became a standard, so everybody who says Donder does have a leg to stand on.

Subsequent publishers have used both versions -- some sticking with the 1844 Donder and some reasoning that the author must have meant Donner. 

In 1949, when I was 8 years old, the newly minted "Rudolph the Red-Nosed Reindeer" became a wildly popular Christmas song. In those days, everyone listened to the radio, and every radio station played Christmas songs from Thanksgiving through Christmas. I must have heard that song hundreds of times since then. It uses Donner -- another reason why that version sounds so natural to me.

So go ahead and say Donder if you must, but I'll continue to regard it as a typo.

Each

"Each" is grammatically singular. It represents multiple items, but one at a time.

You can argue the logic of it, but until the rule changes, don't say "Each of them want to do a good job."   Each . . . wants . . .

The same applies to "either" and "neither." They are grammatically singular too. Also "everybody," "everyone," "nobody," and "no one."